The pedaling frequency is the number of rotations of the pedal per minute.
Research into the optimal pedaling frequency has been extensive. Already in
1929, Hartree and Hill indicated that there had to be an optimal pedaling
frequency. When a cyclist pedals too slowly, energy is taken away from both
power, as well as duration of contraction. On the other hand, if a cyclist
pedals too quickly, energy is lost to overcoming internal resistance in the
muscle. So there has to be an optimum; however, Hartree and Hill failed to
indicate where this optimum was to be found.
In other surveys, the lowest level of oxygen intake was used as a criterion.
Gregor (1986) presented an overview of these studies. In most instances, the
result was somewhere between 33 and 80 rotations per minute (rpm); however, in
reality, most cyclists invariably choose a frequency that lies between 90 and
110 rpm. At first it was believed that this difference could be explained by
the effect of training, but this hypothesis lost ground as a result of tests
conducted by Boning and associates (1986). He tested both trained as well as
untrained test persons and came to the conclusion that, in spite of the greater
effort that untrained test persons experienced when resistance increased, the
optimal pedaling frequencies did not change. A few years earlier, however,
Hagberg (1981) made an interesting discovery. He noticed that, when deducting
oxygen usage in cycling without resistance from the oxygen usage in cycling
with resistance, the optimal pedaling frequency shifted towards 100 rpm.
Redfield and Hull (1986) had an explanation. They used the sum of the torques
in ankle, knee and hip as a criterion (Cost function, see diagram). This was
calculated in the function of the pedaling frequency, and it appeared that it
was the lowest between 90 and 100 rpm. This corresponds quite well with the
pedaling frequency of cyclists in everyday reality.
Cost
function
Crank
arm
length
Optimal
combination
of cadence and
crank arm length
Minimum
cost
Cadence
High-Tech Cycling (1996)
In other research, Hull (1988) looked into pedaling frequency in more depth. He
made use of a combination of joint torques and tension in the muscles in
relation to the pedaling frequency. In this survey an optimum was also found at
a frequency between 90 and 100 rpm. Apparently, the tension that arises in the
leg muscles during cycling is the most decisive factor for the pedaling
frequency. This shows that already in 1929 Hartree and Hill came very close to
explaining why lower pedaling frequencies were far from ideal.
Cadence in real live:
The list, below, with all the postwar world hour records illustrates that for
this specific aspect of the cycling sport a somewhat higher pedaling frequency
is preferred; the average here is 103 rpm
| Year |
Name |
KM |
RPM |
| 1956 |
Jacques Anquetil |
46.159 |
104.0 |
| 1956 |
Ercole Baldini |
46.393 |
? |
| 1957 |
Roger Riviere |
46.924 |
105.7 |
| 1958 |
Roger Riviere |
47.346 |
104.7 |
| 1967 |
Ferdinand Bracke |
48.093 |
106.3 |
| 1968 |
Ole Ritter |
48.653 |
105.4 |
| 1972 |
Eddy merckx |
49.431 |
103.9 |
| 1984 |
Francesco Moser |
50.808 |
104.3 |
| 1984 |
Francesco Moser |
51.151 |
103.1 |
| 1993 |
Graeme Obree |
51.596 |
93.0 |
| 1993 |
Chris Boardman |
52.270 |
101.8 |
| 1994 |
Graeme Obree |
52.713 |
? |
| 1994 |
Miguel Indurain |
53.040 |
100.9 |
| 1994 |
Tony Rominger |
53.832 |
101.4 |
| 1994 |
Tony Rominger |
55.291 |
102.2 |
| 1996 |
Chris Boardman |
56.375 |
105.0 |